It is absurd for technology to annihilate creativity. Adroitness consistently precedes technology. The angle that technology can annihilate adroitness is like annoying that a timberline can annihilate the sun. Adroitness is the force that drives technology.
What is creativity?
Common definition: adeptness to aftermath something new through aesthetic skill, whether a new band-aid to a problem, a new adjustment or device, or a new aesthetic article or form. The appellation about refers to a affluence of account and boldness of thinking. If you can’t abstract all that easily, don’t worry. I couldn’t either. There are abounding definitions of adroitness and they are all circuitous and bombastic but I anticipate Einstein said it best. “Creativity is seeing what anybody abroad has seen, and cerebration what no one abroad has thought.” That’s adroitness in a nutshell. (Einstein, quoted in Creativity, Design and Business Performance.)
Perceptions of the aesthetic type
The appellation creative, if activated to a beastly usually provokes the angel of the aesthetic type: the writer, the musician, and the painter a part of others. And conversely, it is generally affected that the engineer, businessman, or scientist is not creative, but it can be absolutely the opposite. In my ascertainment it is added generally than not the acknowledged accepting who is creative, not a accurate blazon of person. If searching at the analogue of adroitness you can see that adroitness is not the adeptness to draw well, or accept continued hair, but the adeptness to aftermath something new whether it be a song or a bigger business archetypal or a safer car. All of these advances arise from aesthetic minds.
Creativity is the adeptness to break problems in a altered way and is not bound to the arts. The accomplished arts are added about self-expression and not necessarily botheration solving. In any case, adroitness in announcement and botheration analytic has been abundantly added and unleashed by technology.
Creativity consistently precedes technology
When man aboriginal empiric that a aciculate stick could annihilate an beastly or be acclimated to aces his teeth he was authoritative that bound from celebratory to accepting creative. Someone had to accept the abstraction of application a log as a roller afore they in actuality acclimated it that way. Again came the Roller 2.0 or Caster 1.0 depending on who you ask. The point is that the caster didn’t stop creativity, adroitness gave us the board wheel, again the wagon wheel, again the bike tire, again the car tire…
Apparent accident of Creativity
You may apprehend humans atramentous the accident of creativity, but that is abandoned a perceived accident of creativity. Humans adulation citation the affluence of bad books, blah art, actual shitty videos, and abhorrent songs begin on the Internet but they are wrong. There are added humans cogent adroitness today than anytime afore in history. Don’t abash abundance and aesthetic announcement with quality. Furthermore, while it may arise that the superior of aesthetic achievement has suffered a austere decline, it hasn’t. There are just so abounding humans cogent themselves creatively, and we accept admission to it all, so it seems that there is annihilation out there but a abundance of crap. In my acquaintance there is decidedly added superior aesthetic achievement accessible than anytime before.
Creativity needs inspiration
We accept a lot of that accessible now. 24 hours a day we can acquisition afflatus in the anatomy of books, blogs, images, movies, music, art, photographs, you name it. Afflatus is actual important to adroitness and admitting the abundance of cyberbanking afflatus available, this is one breadth area I can see the crisis of adroitness accepting bantam by technology.
Hands on acquaintance is basal to creativity. You can’t abundantly call a anguish boscage rain, or the activity of walking accomplished an abandoned abode abandoned at night, or the that appears to smell of a bath at a gas station, unless you’ve accomplished them. There are so abounding smells, feelings, sensations, etc. which accomplish you a abundant bigger architect that you just can’t get from sitting in foreground of a screen. The ammunition of aesthetic adroitness is afflatus and the capacity for afflatus are adeptness and experience. We accept a all-inclusive bulk of adeptness at our fingertips. We just accept to accomplish abiding we accept affluence of real-life experience. The accident of afflatus can abate adroitness but that is a case of technology confusing us from concrete sources of inspiration, not replacing or antibacterial creativity.
Will technology alter the artist?
Technology will not alter the artisan (at atomic not in the abreast future) or aesthetic types; it in actuality requires added of us. A programmer can address added circuitous and aesthetic cipher that will do abounding banal functions, even artful creativity, but that adeptness to actor is annihilation added than coded instructions and there is a absolute to what they can do. Real beastly adroitness can accomplish leaps and all-overs and associations that a affairs can’t.
For example, there are applications that can yield a photo and accomplish it attending like a duke sketched portrait, and they can attending very, actual convincing. These programs are prime examples of technology and its limits. No amount how acceptable the program, there are still abounding decisions that a beastly will accomplish differently, admitting the computer plows on through accustomed out all of its instructions in the aforementioned exact way anniversary time. What’s accepting coded is a automated process, not creativity. In the case of the account programs, an artisan sat with a programmer and they advised pictures together. The artisan explained to the programmer that accustomed assertive aspects and elements of an angel he would account or draw them in a assertive way. He adeptness explain hundreds of variables and how they administer to adumbration and light. The programmer again wrote the cipher that will assay lights and darks, contrast, colors, and even focus and body of detail. But if a alternation of images are fed through it the affairs will access the assignment the exact aforementioned way anniversary time admitting an artisan will consistently do something different. They adeptness be in a acceptable or bad affection that day, maybe biased appear eyes and not lips, or accept agitation cartoon nostrils, or the account evokes a assertive reaction, not to acknowledgment the training and claimed accomplishments of the artist. All accord to the character of the piece.
Creativity is accepting accelerated by technology, not stifled
Photoshop and Chat are both pieces of software that accomplish creating awfully easier and quicker, and affection accoutrement that can do some of the automated plan for us, but they don’t alter creativity. Just as Leonardo Da Vinci acclimated the best accoutrement and techniques of his day, artists accepting progressed accomplished abrading clay and ash on cavern walls, are aswell affective accomplished paints and brushes and application tablets and blow screens. Technology changes, adroitness doesn’t.
We are accident the arts
There is something actual abundant activity about an old oil painting or aged book and I ache their abbreviation in the avant-garde world. But those are losses of technology and not creativity.
We are evolving our processes. I abhorrence to see the aphotic allowance go the way of the blast booth. I bethink animate in a aphotic allowance and I admired the atmosphere, but that is all claimed and sentimental. Besides, there will consistently be diehard traditionalist that will accumulate the old means alive, just as there are still those who like to handcraft wood, leather, and participate in added ancient processes for the achievement of it and to accumulate the old means alive. I am not adage it’s a acceptable affair that processes are dying off, absolutely the contrary. I anticipate it is important for a countless of affidavit to accumulate old processes alive. But there are abounding allowances to the change of these processes.
The barrier of amount and accessibility accept plummeted for about any aesthetic endeavor. Writing, art, music, photography, you name it and technology has fabricated it cheap, even free, to accurate oneself.
I am not abiding of the ecological impact, but all those chemicals acclimated in the aphotic allowance were generally dumped down the drain. Books were duke typed, and even if computers and email accessories were aboriginal advancing out, publishers still accepted a appointment columnist to book a arrangement and mail it to them. That took canicule and hundred dollars which is batty to even accede today. My endure atypical was apprehend and edited by several humans worldwide, even the awning was advised by an artisan far abroad from area I live. I calmly and about cheaply appear a able superior novel. The aesthetic content, my announcement of creativity, may be up for debate, but all added aspects of the atypical were done as able-bodied as, or even bigger than, any administrator could accept done. This was not even dreamed of just a abbreviate time ago and I acclimated no paper, shipping, ink, etc.
And it’s not just barriers of amount and accessibility but audience. Recently if you were to get a book appear you had to argue a administrator you had a huge audience. Now you can broadcast a book because you wish to, or for a alcove audience. How to Wash Your Llama adeptness do able-bodied in assertive circles.
So our accoutrement accomplish the job easier, but do they crave beneath talent? No, and the acumen there are so abounding bottom accomplished artists in apportionment is because there is such a top appeal for content. But that’s abundant account for artists. Artists don’t accept to be the craving artisan anymore. As an artist; whether you are a writer, artist, designer, musician, articulation over aptitude – you can plan from anywhere in the world. You can advertise your art online, get assassin to do jobs, even advantage your success to actualize added success.
I am old abundant to bethink cameras that acclimated film, televisions that were atramentous and white, and phones that were absorbed to the bank and worse still, phones could abandoned be acclimated as phones. And I bethink what it took to attack to get a book published. The humans accepting appear weren’t the best writers, they were the best at adverse a mind-numbingly circuitous and arid job that could yield years and would acceptable advance to nothing. And self-publishing was ridiculous. Even if you had the bags of dollars it took to do even a baby book run you hadn’t even aching the apparent of accepting a book marketed, distributed, and sold. Abounding ambitious authors concluded up with a barn abounding of books they couldn’t accord away.
Today companies like Actualize Space accept removed around every barrier there anytime was to autograph and publishing a book except for one – the adeptness to in actuality address the book. It is consistently faster and beneath big-ticket now to get a book beta read, edited, awning designed, and fabricated accessible for the apple to buy. In the adventure to broadcast my own works, I’ve announced with writers who accept spent hundreds or even bags business a book and generated about no sales. I’ve aswell talked to several that just put the book out there and chat of aperture and acceptable reviews led to added and added sales.
One in accurate has a account agnate to mine. He spent twenty years accepting the publishers and agents cogent him, “No thanks.”
They all had affidavit not to broadcast him and a lot of were adverse to the other. Too long, too short, too abounding characters, or not abundant characters. He started self-publishing about 5 years ago and has aback abdicate his job and writes fulltime. Humans adulation his books, the actual aforementioned books that all the “professionals” said would never accomplish it. And the funny affair is, those aforementioned publishers accept arise aback to him absent the rights to broadcast his work. He said, “No.”
Why would he assurance abroad his rights and get a atom of the book sales so a administrator could accomplish money? With a acceptable book, about no business is required, but that of advance is the exception, not the rule. But even an abundantly bad book can accomplish money in this new world. In the publisher’s defense, publishing a book was badly big-ticket and they had to aces winners, books that would advertise a ample amount of copies.
I accept apprehend a few absolutely bad, crazy, or antic books and enjoyed them. Maybe bedlam at them as they were so bad, but still I paid and the columnist got some money. There are books that were accounting so carefully antic that maybe 400 humans will anytime apprehend them, but those books would never accept apparent the ablaze of day ahead and never, anytime accept fabricated a penny. But one awfully asinine book today can be enjoyed by a few hundred humans and net the columnist a few dollars. In accession the apple has a small, actual altered book accessible to it that contrarily it wouldn’t have.
We are in a Renaissance clashing annihilation aback the 1700′s. Abundant of what we adulation was birthed in the aesthetic Renaissance: the novel, changeable writers, etc. Software, computers, technology itself, are accoutrement and aesthetic humans consistently use tools, well, added creatively. If a section of software is appear that does a allegedly aesthetic assignment and al of a sudden anybody can do that task, the aesthetic and accomplished accepting is traveling to use that apparatus added finer and to a bigger end than a lot of others.
I came up with the abstraction for my a lot of acknowledged book because I accomplished that commonly accomplished artists weren’t application the abounding ability of accessible technology and cocky accomplished artists who abstruse on the computer lacked basal art skills. You charge both to absolutely excel.
The added aesthetic we are, the added technology progresses which in about-face allows us to be added creative.
Technology is removing barriers to creativity, not replacing it.